Thread:Andrew444/@comment-2239664-20121008165033

Andrew, I would like to ask you a few things you changed in the Betting pools for 2013. You added a few new sections for this year, and while not all of them are "bad" additions, I don't think some should be there. For one, there should not be a section for which exact storm names get retired IMO because there's no restriction of the number of names to bet on. I mean, I could sign my post on every single name and would win no matter what happened. With the landfall and track description sections, both of those sections kinda fall under the "strangest storm" section and are unnecessary IMO. Also, is a "star sign" section really necessary? Not sure if it was you or Liz that made that two days ago, but it's not anything directly related to seasonal statistics, which is what the betting pools are based off of. It's something that would be better left on the "hurricane talk" page than the betting pools. I wanted to ask you first before removing them myself. 