Thread:188.223.248.201/@comment-2239664-20121008222600

You added a few new sections for the betting pools this year, and while not all of them are "bad" additions, I don't think some should be there. For one, there should not be a section for which exact storm names get retired IMO because there's no restriction of the number of names to bet on. I mean, I could sign my post on every single name and would win no matter what happened. With the landfall and track description sections, both of those sections kinda fall under the "strangest storm" section and are unnecessary IMO. Also, is a "star sign" section really necessary? It's not anything directly related to seasonal statistics, which is what the betting pools are based off of. It's something that would be better left on the "hurricane talk" page than the betting pools. I wanted to ask you why you think the new sections should be added, but I feel they are unnecessary and I want to remove some of the aforementioned ones. 